hello

hello

PDO Indicators Report
State : All ,    District : All ,    Block : All

hello

State 

hello

District 

hello

Block 
Serial PDO Indicators Formula Availability /Limitations Data Source/Methodology Project Taregt Achievement
1.1 At least 60% of women SHG members achieve a minimum of 30% increased income of their HH in real terms by end of project % of livelihood interventions much less than 60% HH survey
2.1 At least 30% of project-benefited unemployed youths are employed. No. of youth starting work in placement after skills training / No. Of youth trained Excel DB sourced from block office enrollment form and job acceptance data from skills agency Project MIS And Evaluation 30% 24.72 %
3.1 Direct Project beneficiary Two values will be presented a) No. of HHDs where any member has taken a loan, are a CDP beneficiary, or received livelihood or skills training or any other intervention support Sum of unique SHG HH, youth trained, non-SHG non-PG CDP benefitted HH, PG, PO HH not in SHG/CDP beneficiary HH list b) No. of unique HHD members who have received any of the above interventions Sum of unique SHG members, youth trained, non-SHG non-PG CDP beneficiaries, PG, PO members not in SHG/CDP beneficiary list Only approx. values are available through MIS since there is no unique HHD ID or individual ID. It is difficult to measure exact number of unique CDP users. Project MIS (approx.) And estimates from the Evaluation HHD survey 2,75,000 413081
4.1 Female Beneficiary As above but the 2nd version will count only unique women Only approx. values are available through MIS since there is no unique HHD ID or individual ID. It is difficult to measure exact number of unique CDP users. Project MIS And Evaluation 1,25,000 411171
Social Empowerment
1.1 At least 50% of women in project area who were not formerly in SHGs become members of project supported SHGs No. of first time SHG members / Total project SHG members Available Project MIS 50% 86.19 %
1.2 At least 90% of SHGs receiving project loans repay them regularly No of SHGs who received project loans and loans from federation and have no overdue / Total number of SHGs Data unreliable as it is not entered into MIS from hard copy Project MIS & Evaluation SHG survey 80%
1.3 At least 60% of the Project SHGs achieve “A” Grade. Current no of SHGs with grade A (in seed or LT1 or LT2 or LT3 currently) / Total no. of SHGs active Note currently grading SHGs monthly. Basis should be avg grade in last 6 months Project MIS 60% 93.62 %
1.4 At least 50% of institutions created are sustainable No. of inst with operating income > operating cost of federations. Currently not captured SHG evaluation survey for SHGs only not federations Project MIS for federations N/a
1.5 At least 5% of positions in traditional and formal village institutions are held by members of the most disadvantaged households. No of disadvantaged (POP-ST, SC others, female-headed, the physically challenged) members in all institutions who got positions in PRI and Village Council / Total number of positions Excel Report from the Districts Project MIS 5%
1.6 Of the total para-professionals, at least 30% are women Total number of females as para vet, CRPs for livelihood, community agri entrepreneurs, pasusakhis, CSPs, cluster resource persons, SHG facilitators, Bank Facilitators, Bank Mitra / Total number of para professionals Available Excel Report from the Districts Project MIS 25%
1.7 At least 40% of community institutions have tribal representation No. of Executive committees or OBs in federations, PG, PO and CDGs who have at least 1 ST member/No. Of PG+Fed+CGDs in tribal or mixed areas Project MIS 40%
1.8 CDP Plans financed and implemented in at least 30% of project villages Only CDPs which have been (handed-over) / total no of project villages (where CDP is practically possible) Project MIS 30% 38.21 %
1.9 40% Share of vulnerable and marginalized people under the project that are project beneficiaries #PoP or #STs households /project beneficiary households Project MIS 40% 95.29 %
1.10 Vulnerable and marginalized people under the project area that are project beneficiaries-female #PoP or #STs households /project beneficiary households (Only females) Project MIS 75,000 93.62 %
Economic Empowerment
2.1 A minimum of 60% of SHG women members have taken at least one loan Total number of members who has taken at least one loan from either seed or LT1 or LT2 or LT3 / Total number of Members HHD Survey and Project MIS 60% 0.00 %
2.2 At least 70% of the HH diversified or up-scaled their income-generating activities Evaluation HHD Survey 70%
2.3 At least 75% of women SHG members increase their savings by 50% above their Year 1 levels. (Cum.Saving_Month 60 – Cum.saving_Month 12) / Cum.Saving_Month 12 Project MIS 75%
2.4 At least 50% of eligible village youth have received training # training completed fully (don’t include dropouts) / No. of youth who registered Project MIS and youth survey 50% 35.37 %
2.5 At least 70% of the SHGs supported by the project are institutionally sustainable. SHGs: Sustainability definition a. Regular meetings b. Regular savings c. Common activities d. Any business activities or social activities done together e. Cohesiveness f. Perceived value of being in a group. Will they continue to be in the group after the project is over? g. Rotation of leadership h. Sustainability of book keeping. Who is recording and is the group able to pay the service fees in case it’s an outsider i. Regular repayment of internal loans j. Bank linkage and regular repayment of bank loans k. Are they paying fees to federation on regular basis SHG Survey
Partnership Development
3.1 By end of Project, at least 15% of project village level CDP investments come from government/quasi government and community sources. Convergence funds into CDPs + LRM including land value donated to project/Only CDP investments Project MIS 15%
3.2 At least 30% of SHGs access credit from formal institutions. members, No. of SHGs having bank linkage / Original Project Target No. of SHGs Project MIS And SHG survey supporting 30%
Value Chains and Livelihood Model
5.1 At least 25% of households adopt improved farm and non-farm technologies / improved practices promoted by the project In evaluation HH Survey and Project MIS 25%
5.2 At least 25% of project households linked to new input or output markets In evaluation HH Survey and Project MIS 25%
5.3 At least 25% of Producer Organizations formed under the project are operational and sustainable. Thematic case studies 25%